Last reviewed on May 12, 2026 by the Government.biz editorial team against FAR Part 43 and the standard Changes clauses.

What a contract modification is

A modification is any written change to the terms of an existing federal contract. The rules live in FAR Part 43, and almost every modification is documented on Standard Form 30 (SF-30), "Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract." The SF-30 states the modification number, cites the authority for the change, and shows whether it is bilateral or unilateral.

Understanding modifications matters because this is where contract performance most often goes sideways — and where contractors most often leave money on the table. Knowing when you are entitled to more time or money, and how to ask for it correctly, is one of the highest-value skills in contract administration.

Bilateral vs. unilateral modifications

Bilateral (supplemental agreement)

Signed by both the contractor and the contracting officer. Required whenever the change needs agreement — adjusting price, definitizing a change order, modifying scope, or settling an REA.

  • Negotiated scope or price changes
  • Definitization of prior change orders
  • Settlement of equitable adjustments
  • Funding increases the contractor accepts

Unilateral

Signed only by the contracting officer, for actions the government may take without your consent under the contract's existing clauses.

  • Administrative changes (e.g., paying-office or address corrections)
  • Exercising a priced option (FAR 52.217-9)
  • Issuing a change order under the Changes clause
  • Incremental funding modifications
Key point: a unilateral change order can direct you to perform changed work now while the price is settled later. Do not refuse to perform a directed in-scope change — perform it, document the impact, and pursue the equitable adjustment.

The Changes clause: the engine behind change orders

Nearly every federal contract contains a Changes clause — the exact version depends on contract type (FAR 52.243-1 for fixed-price supplies, 52.243-2 for cost-reimbursement, 52.243-3 for time-and-materials, 52.243-4 for construction). The clause gives the contracting officer authority to order changes within the general scope of the contract — to drawings, specifications, method of performance, place of delivery, and similar items. In exchange, it entitles the contractor to an equitable adjustment in price and schedule for the impact of the change.

The clause also imposes a notice obligation: a contractor that believes a government direction is a change generally must assert its right to an adjustment within a defined window (commonly 30 days) and before final payment. Missing the notice window is a frequent and avoidable way to lose an otherwise valid entitlement.

In-scope changes vs. cardinal changes

The Changes clause only reaches work within the general scope of the contract. A change so large or different that it is essentially new work is a cardinal change — and a cardinal change is outside the clause. Cardinal changes matter for two reasons:

Whether a change is in-scope or cardinal is a fact question turning on the nature, magnitude, and number of changes relative to the original bargain. When a directed change feels like a different contract, raise the scope question in writing before performing.

Constructive changes: when there's no formal change order

Sometimes the government changes your work without issuing a change order at all. The law treats this as a constructive change — and it can still entitle you to an equitable adjustment. Classic categories:

Document in real time. Constructive-change recoveries are won or lost on contemporaneous records. Give prompt written notice, keep a daily diary of the disruption, segregate the added costs in your accounting, and tie each dollar to a specific government action.

Requests for Equitable Adjustment (REA)

An REA is how you ask the contracting officer to adjust the contract price or schedule for a change. It is a negotiation document, not a lawsuit. A persuasive REA contains:

REA vs. claim under the Contract Disputes Act

An REA and a claim are different instruments, and the distinction has real consequences:

REAClaim (Contract Disputes Act)
NatureBusiness request to negotiateFormal demand for a final decision
CertificationDFARS cert for DoD over SATCDA certification required over $100,000
InterestGenerally none until it becomes a claimInterest runs from receipt of the certified claim
OutcomeNegotiated bilateral modificationContracting officer's final decision, then appeal to a board or the Court of Federal Claims
Cost recoveryREA prep costs can be recoverable as contract administrationClaim prosecution costs are generally not recoverable

Most contractors pursue an REA first to preserve the relationship and recover preparation costs, then convert to a certified claim only if negotiations fail. See bid protests for the separate pre-award dispute track.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a bilateral and unilateral modification?

A bilateral modification (supplemental agreement) is signed by both parties and used when the change requires agreement on price or scope. A unilateral modification is signed only by the contracting officer for actions the government can take alone — administrative changes, option exercises, change orders, and funding mods.

What is the difference between an REA and a claim?

An REA is a business request to negotiate an adjustment. A claim is a formal demand under the Contract Disputes Act for a contracting officer's final decision; claims over $100,000 must be certified, and they start interest running. Contractors usually try the REA route first.

What is a constructive change?

Government conduct that changes the work without a formal change order — defective specs, improper rejection, government-caused delay, or directed acceleration. If it adds cost or time, you may be owed an equitable adjustment, but you must give prompt written notice and document the impact.

Do I have to keep working if I disagree with a change order?

For an in-scope unilateral change order, yes — perform the changed work and pursue the adjustment afterward. For a suspected cardinal change (work beyond the contract's general scope), raise the scope objection in writing before performing, because that work may be outside the Changes clause entirely.

Related pages

Authoritative sources: FAR Part 43 — Contract Modifications and the Changes clauses at FAR 52.243. This page is general information, not legal advice; significant disputes warrant qualified government-contracts counsel.